Municipality of Brighton Candidate Responses
Mayoral Candidates
Brian Ostrander
Answer: Yes
Additional comments:
The proposal to explore large-scale nuclear generation at the 1,300-acre Wesleyville site in Port Hope represents one of the most transformative economic conversations in our region’s history. While the prospect of major energy generation on a site already zoned for power is compelling, evaluating whether this is a good path forward requires a balanced approach. We must carefully weigh the long-term regional economic benefits against valid concerns regarding power utility rates, while demanding strict local guardrails to ensure our infrastructure and residents are fully protected.
From an economic perspective, the scale of potential investment at Wesleyville is undeniable. A project of this magnitude would drive billions in long-term investments and create thousands of well-paying skilled jobs throughout construction and ongoing operations. Furthermore, it positions our region as a central pillar in Ontario’s clean-energy transition, providing reliable, low-carbon power for decades to come. However, these benefits must not come at the expense of energy affordability; provincial energy planners and regulatory authorities must ensure robust procurement frameworks and cost-overrun protections so that ratepayers across Ontario and locally are not saddled with inflated electricity bills.
Support for the Wesleyville project cannot be a blank check; it must be strictly contingent on guardrails established long before any major construction begins. An influx of thousands of workers will place unprecedented demand on regional housing, making developer-funded worker accommodations and proactive housing supply investments non-negotiable to prevent displacing local families or escalating local housing costs. Additionally, the heavy toll on regional transportation, emergency response, and municipal infrastructure must be offset by dedicated provincial infrastructure funding. Comprehensive traffic management, road upgrades, transit links, and funding for paramedic, police, and fire services.
Crucially, planning for this project must recognize that while the site’s physical boundary resides in Port Hope, the practical footprint spans all of Northumberland County. Neighbouring municipalities will absorb the secondary impacts—from workforce settlement and school enrollments to increased traffic on road networks and healthcare usage. Because these impacts do not stop at municipal borders, Northumberland County as the upper-tier municipality, must be fully included as a host community partner alongside Port Hope. Community benefit agreements, mitigation funding, and regional infrastructure grants must be distributed across the county to ensure every affected local tax base is protected and supported.
Ultimately, utilizing the Wesleyville site for new nuclear generation can be a powerful catalyst for prosperity, provided the project is managed with foresight and regional accountability. We must maximize the high-skilled employment and industrial growth opportunity while maintaining an unyielding stance on ratepayer protection, workforce housing, and transit infrastructure. By treating Northumberland County as a true host partner in both mitigation and economic planning, we can ensure this massive project delivers a sustainable, net-positive legacy for all of our communities.
Bobbi Wright
Answer: Undecided
Additional comments:
The potential new facility of up to 10,000 megawatts would be an enormous project, and I would want to see the full business case, the cost of running it, the projected impact on electricity rates, environmental and safety assessments, and meaningful consultation with the surrounding municipalities, residents and Indigenous communities before deciding whether a project of that scale makes sense.
From Brighton’s perspective, we’re close enough that we should be paying attention and making sure our residents’ interests are represented as that process moves forward.
Deputy Mayor Candidates
No responses received yetCouncillor Candidates
Tammy Archer
Answer: No
Additional comments:
Mark Bateman
Answer: Undecided
Additional comments:
Let me qualify selecting undecided. I believe that decisions should be based on data and information pertinente to what we are going to render a decision on. Once I see all available data I would then be able to make an informed decision.
Anne Butwell
Answer: No
Additional comments:
Courtney Goodmurphy
Answer: Undecided
Additional comments:
Catherine Stutt
Answer: Undecided
Additional comments:
I do not believe there is enough data publicly available regarding the project to allow me to make an informed decision.
Jeff Wheeldon
Answer: No
Additional comments:
I don’t think it’s a good use of the site, whether or not it drives up rates. Solar is cheaper, and able to be distributed, spreading out the benefits of energy generation to many more people. Distributed generation is also more resilient to damage or failure, and less of a target. It’s faster, too.